Resources
This institution also appears in
 Ceibs699 Hongfeng Road Pudong Shanghai 201206 China t: mba +86-21-28905555 t: emba +86-21-28905888 e: mba admissions@ceibs.edu e: emba emba@ceibs.edu w: www.ceibs.edu | |
|---|---|
| Global MBA rankings 2007 | |
| School name | Ceibs |
| Rankings at a glance | |
|---|---|
| Current rank | 11 |
| Rank in 2006[1] | 21 |
| Rank in 2005[1] | 22 |
| 3 year average rank[1] | 18 |
| Country[1] | China |
| Audit year[2] | 2006 |
| Alumni career progress | |
|---|---|
| Salary today (US$) | 146,410 |
| Weighted salary (US$) | 146,410 |
| Salary percentage increase | 159 |
| Value for money rank | 45 |
| Career progress rank | 31 |
| Aims achieved (%) | 77 |
| Placement success rank | 32 |
| Employed at three months (%) | 99 (92) |
| Alumni recommend rank | 62 |
| Diversity | |
|---|---|
| Women faculty (%) | 8 |
| Women students (%) | 30 |
| Women board (%) | 10 |
| International faculty (%) | 68 |
| International students (%) | 29 |
| International board (%) | 50 |
| International mobility rank | 99 |
| International experience rank | 9 |
| Languages[3] | 1 |
| Idea generation | |
|---|---|
| Faculty with doctorates (%) | 95 |
| FT doctoral rank | n/a[4] |
| FT research rank | 81 |
Footnotes
1. These data are for information only and are not used in the rankings.
2. KPMG reported on the results of obtaining evidence and applying specified audit procedures relating to selected data provided for the Financial Times 2007 MBA survey ranking for selected business schools. Enquiries about the process can be made by contacting Michelle Podhy and Patrick Gaudet of KPMG by email at mpodhy@kpmg.ca. The specified audit procedures were carried out between November 2006 and January 2007. The audit date denotes the survey for which the specified audit procedures were conducted.
3. These schools run additional courses for MBA students for which additional language skills are required. These figures are included in the calculations for the ranking but are not represented on the table to avoid confusion.
4. Not applicable.
