Footnotes1. These data are for information only and do not form part of the final ranking.
2. The provision of advanced information on programme content and the participant selection process.
3. The flexibility of the course and appropriateness of class size, structure and design.
4. Contemporary and appropriate teaching materials and a suitable mix of academic rigour and practical relevance.
5. The quality of the teaching and the extent to which teaching staff worked together to present a coherent programme.
6. The extent to which other participants were of the appropriate managerial/ academic level, the international mix of the class and the interaction between course participants.
7. The relevance of new skills to the workplace, the ease with which they were implemented and the extent to which the course encouraged new ways of thinking.
8. The level of follow-up offered after participants returned to their workplace and networking opportunities with other participants.
9. The degree to which participant and company expectations were met.
10. The quality of food and accommodation.
11. The quality of teaching accommodation and IT and library facilities.
12. The percentage of female participants.
13. Amalgamates the percentage of participants from outside the business school’s base country and region (e.g. North America, Europe, Asia etc.).
14. Amalgamates growth in income and percentage of repeat business.
15. Programmes run outside the business school’s base country and region.
16. The quantity and quality of programmes taught in conjunction with other business schools.
17. The mix of faculty by nationality and gender.
18. Income from open programmes in 2009 in millions of $US. For schools based outside the US figures are based on average dollar currency exchange rates for 2009.
These data are given for information only and do not form part of the final ranking.
19. Aggregate total for open and customised programmes.
20. Includes revenue from food and accommodation
21. Includes revenue from food